My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02497
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/14/1971
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7202 <br /> <br />other words, if we are asking the state to pro- <br />ceed with this 94 acres of land, that repre- <br />sents approximately 20% of the land area within <br />the proposed parks. We need the assurance that <br />the state will in fact proceed with that funding, <br />that the Colorado Water Conservation Board will <br />endorse that funding to proceed in this way <br />before we can go ahead. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Now here again, the legislature is not in <br />session, we have not had time to contact all the <br />legislators, and we have not yet had time to <br />make contact with the board. We would like to <br />discuss it with you in more detail before we <br />proceed further with this. <br /> <br />Now the fifth point is, the City has not <br />thought in any more than a conceptual way of the <br />possibility of expanding this proposal on to the <br />north. In other words, if there are certain <br />merits in preserving the river valley to the <br />south of Columbine Valley, are those same merits <br />in existence to the river valley to the north? <br />Now to move north to Bowles particularly would <br />require the concurrence of .Columbine Valley <br />because there would be some limited flooding to <br />the golf course. We have not yet had the opportu- <br />nity to discuss this with representatives of <br />Columbine Valley, and as you heard their speaker <br />mention earlier, there may very likely be some <br />opposition. <br /> <br />Here on that point 'Does the project stop <br />here, or does it move north?' To move it clear <br />north to Belleview would require some relation- <br />ship with the Centennial Turf Club because they <br />are very actively interested in it. Here again, <br />the City has not had the opportunity to contact <br />Centennial Turf Club concerning the proposal. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Now finally, to move the scheme on north to <br />Oxford w?uld require this same kind of commit- <br />ment from the Town of Sheridan and the City of <br />Englewood. We have not talked in any more than <br />a conceptual way with the representatives of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.