My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02488
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:21 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/17/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: He has asked for an amendment to the motion. Could I <br />have a second to that? And then we will discuss it. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I will second it. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: All right. John. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: They have a contract for one cfs, as I understand it. <br />out of the source of water from the Division of wildlife. <br /> <br />MR. ROBBINS: That is right. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: One cfs, theoretically, would handle between 4 and 5.000 <br />people. <br /> <br />MR. ROBBINS: You are the expert, Mr. Fetcher. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Just quantifying the water for everybody's knowledge. <br /> <br />MR. ROBBINS: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: And on that basis I wouldn't see that there would be any <br />problem with Basalt. unless they have a comment to make on this. <br /> <br />MR. ROBBINS: My concern is only that I don't want an argument to arise <br />20 years from now when all of us are elsewhere that the state somehow, <br />through this board,affected a contract that another state agency has. <br />I am confident that the Town of Basalt doesn't propose. or the present <br />administration doesn't propose. to affect that contract. I am confi- <br />dent that their attorney does not. I simply want the record clear <br />when this board acts on this proposal, because Basalt does intend. <br />suant to their engineering study. to utilize Luxinger Creek water. <br />just want the recognition to exist that, in fact, there are rights <br />owned by the state. <br /> <br />pur- <br />I <br />there <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Mr. Flewelling. <br /> <br />MR. FLEWELLING: In an attempt to alleviate some of your fears on that <br />situation, we would like to advise the Board that the Town of Basalt <br />currently is negotiating with the Division of Wildlife, even the Town <br />of Carbondale and the Division of Wildlife Fish Hatchery, on the <br />Crystal River. in an attempt to work out a three-way trade which will <br />end up being beneficial to everyone. They recognize the prOblem. and <br />an ongoing effort is being made. It looks like some fruition will be <br />reached very quickly. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Thank you. Is there any further comment? <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I would accept that modification. <br /> <br />MR. FURNEAUX: I. too. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: All right. All in favor of the amendment say "Aye." <br />(Ayes.) Those opposed say "No." (NO response.) <br /> <br />-27- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.