My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02488
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:21 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/17/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />There are a couple of things I wOuld like to mention <br />One is that the attendance list was started around. <br />where i~ is, but if you haven't signed it, would you <br />to list your name on the attendance list? <br /> <br />at this point. <br />I don't know <br />make arrangements <br /> <br />Also. I would like to recognize at this moment a former member of our <br />board, Mr. John Benton. who has come in. John, would you stand? We <br />are glad to have you with us this morning. <br /> <br />The action that I understand we can now take, if we wish. is to, as <br />a board. approve these projects. We must consider the priorities <br />that have been given to them. We can put on some limitations. such <br />as the permit that was discussed; and I would ask what your pleasure is. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I would move for approval of the projects in the <br />priority order as listed on this agenda. <br /> <br />MR. FURNEAUX: Second. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Mr. Vandemoer moves that the projects be approved in the <br />priority as listed. and it has been seconded by Mr. Furneaux. Are <br />there any comments or discussion? <br /> <br />MR. ROBBINS: I would like to raise one comment Mr. Chairman. The <br />Division of Wildlife--and this relates to the request of the city of <br />Basalt--the Division of Wildlife owns extensive water rights out of <br />the Luxinger Springs. also called "Luxinger Creek.~' Those rights were <br />purchased with state monies a number of years ago and in most times <br />control a fair portion of the flow of those springs. They are agri- <br />cultural ri~hts. They take water during the irrigation season in <br />priority. There exists at the present time a contract between the <br />Division of'wildlife and the city of Basalt whereby the city of Basalt <br />is authorized to take one cubic foot per second of water out of the <br />Luxinger Springs. They are also allowed by the contract to take that <br />water first if there is only one cfs available. <br /> <br />I am concerned that the State of Colorado's contract with Basalt be <br />honored. I have no indication that it would not be. But I would not <br />want the Board to expend significant funds developing a collection <br />system if, in fact, it were predicated upon the understanding that all <br />of the water in the Luxinger Springs was, in fact, available to the <br />city of Basalt. <br /> <br />I want to make it clear that in the winter season, Basalt can have all <br />the water out of the springs that it needs and has decrees to. And I <br />I would mOve that the additional change be made to the original motion. <br />with the permission of the first and second, that the acceptance of <br />the grant here under discussion be related to the recognition of the <br />Division of wildlife's rights and the validity of their contract and <br />when water is taken in the irrigation season that it is, in fact, <br />taken pursuant to that contract. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Fred, a question? <br /> <br />-26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.