Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tiUl <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />develop power at a much lower cost than either of the two <br />previous plans. While the study is not complete as of this <br />date, it has progressed to a point where it should be fin- <br />ished within one year if funds can be made available to con- <br />tinue work at the present tempo. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />/s/ IVAN C. CRAWFORD <br />Di rector <br /> <br />ICC:ah <br />MR. CRAWFOh'D: <br /> <br />HRegarding the status of the Smith <br />Fork Project, I should like to read the <br />following letter from the Chairman of <br />the USDA Field Advisory Committee: <br /> <br />UNITED STATES <br />DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE <br />Soil Conservation Service <br /> <br />P. O. Box 428 <br />Mesilla Park. N. M. <br /> <br />October 29, 1957 <br /> <br />Ivan C. Crawford, Director <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />212 State Office Building, <br />Denver 2, Colorado <br /> <br />Dear Dean: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The following excerpt from the recent USDA Field Party's <br />progress report gives the information regarding our survey of <br />the Smith Fork Project which you asked for on October 21st. <br /> <br />Smith Fork Proiect, State of Colorado <br /> <br />The survey outline for this project has been prepared <br />and approved by the Field Advisory Committee. Copies <br />have been furnished the Washington office and inter- <br />ested people in Colorado. <br /> <br />The soil survey field work has been completed. Survey <br />data have been tabulated by field sheets and photo- <br />graphic reproductions obtained from the Cartographic <br />Unit. Soil samples for eight of the major soil series <br />found in the project area have been sent to the labora- <br />tory for analysis. <br /> <br />Roy Blanch and Dave Wilson, in collaboration with the <br />