My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02250
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:54 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/6/1951
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />12. Approval of minutes of Board meetings. <br /> <br />Director Stone announced that Judge Dan H. Hughes vmuld not arrive until afternoon; <br />that Teller Ammons was out of town and would not be present; and that M. C. Hinderlider, <br />State Engineer, would be unable to attend. <br />~ <br /> <br />The Director stated that he had received a letter from? newly formed Aspen <br />County Water organization asking to be heard by the Board respecting its opposition to <br />the proposed Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. This r,roup, he said, is scheduled to appear <br />in the Board session at 2:30 o'clock in the afternoon of August 6. <br /> <br />The first order of business was the consideration of ~tem 1 on the agenda. This <br />item concerns the proposed Glendo yroject, located on the North Platte River in V(yomL~g <br />near the 1'(yomiIlg-Nebraska state line. The DirActor explained that several months ago <br />he had asked Jean S. Breitenstein, Attorney for the Board, to ass~e the responsibili~ <br />of handling this matter on behalf of the Board. Mr. Breitenstein has made various re- <br />ports to the Director on the Glendo Project matter, one of which is contained ip his <br />letter of July 10, 1951 which Ylas mimeographed and sent out to the members of the Board. <br /> <br />The Vice'Chairman, then called upon lir. Breitenstein to submit a report to the board <br />on the subject of the proposed Glendo Project. <br /> <br />Because of the importance of the proposed Glendo Project matter to the state of <br />Colorado, and in view of the insertion in the minutes, by instruction of the Board in <br />order to reflect more fully the problems incident thereto, of certain reports and <br />letters submitted to Mr. Breitenstein, there is inserted at this point five paragraphs <br />from the letter of the Director of Region 7, Buneau of Reclamation, to the Commissioner <br />of the Bureau of Reclamation on the subject of the report on the Glendo Unit, Oregon <br />Trail DiVision, Missouri liiver Basin Project as follovls: <br /> <br />"1. This is my definite plan report on the Glendo Unit, Oregon Trail DiviSion, <br />of the Missouri River Basin project. The Glendo Unit, a multiple-purpose develop- <br />ment,consists of the Glendo Dam, Reservoir and power plant, to be located near the <br />town of G~ndo, V(yoming, and the Fremont Canyon power plant, to be located near the <br />backwaters of Alcova Reservoir on the North Platte River, about 3.5 miles down- <br />stream from Pathfinder Dam. The report and substantiating documents are s\tbmitted <br />for your approval and for departmental action with a view toward securing Congres- <br />sional approval for the modified plan of development for the unit. <br /> <br />"2. The Glendo Unit was authorized for construction under the Flood Control <br />Act of 1944 (Public Law 534), 78th Congress, 2d Session, December 22, 1944 (58 <br />Stat. 887) as a unit of the Missouri River Basin project. The plan for the pro- <br />ject was set forth in Senate Document 191, 78th Congress, 2d Session, April,1944. <br />The original authorization provided for a storage cap3.city of approximately. 150,000 <br />acre-feet in the Glendo Reservoir for the purposes of~tional sediment storage <br />and replacement of capacity lost to sediment in Guernsey Reservoir, the reregula- <br />tion of return flows from irrigation on the Kendrick projec~, and the development <br />of more power. <br /> <br />"3. Subsequent investigations have disclosed the necessity for increasing <br />the capacity of Glendo Reservoir to provide for flood control in the highly devel- <br />oped reach of the North Platte River valley in WYoming and Nebraska below the Glendo <br />Reservoir site, and the reregulation of upstream pewler releases so that the waters <br />of the river could he utilized mos~effectively for hydroelectric power production. <br />These needs are in addition to the original purposes of ~~e Glendo Unit. As a <br />result of the later investigations the interested st~tes of Colorado, Nebraska, <br />and \Vyo,?ing 'expressed concern reg"rding _theteffecttofRthe operations of a larger <br />reservo~ on vested water rlghts In th~ Nor h PLat elver. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.