My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02241
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/9/1954
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />482 <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />In the. first place, he did not have tim~_to do <br />it and in the second place, he did not have <br />any money with which to hire somebody to'do <br />it. In the third place, he was satisfied . <br />with the brief I had prepared. I could see <br />no objection inasmuch as Colorado and <br />Wyoming are in an identical situation, both <br />located entirely in the Upper Basin. Utah <br />and New Mexico are not in this situation <br />inasmuch as they are partly in the Upper <br />Basin and partly in the Lower Basin. And <br />so, I bring to the Board Wyoming's request <br />to be permitted to join with Colorado in the <br />same brief. I think it is desirable because <br />by joining in one brief, the Supreme Court <br />will only have to read one brief to get the <br />united' views of these two States. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I may state further that New Mexico and <br />Utah have indicated that they possibly in <br />their brief may say that as to the questions <br />presented by Colorado's brief, they are <br />satisfied with Colorado's position on that <br />point and limit their views to the argument <br />which California has made that Utah and <br />New Mexico should be made parties to that <br />litigation because they are Lower Basin <br />States and are entitled to an interest in <br />the waters of the Lower Basin which are <br />attempted to be divided by this litigation. <br /> <br />"A copy of this proposed brief is on file <br />with Dean Crawford and with Attorney General <br />Dunbar and any of you who are interested can <br />read it. <br /> <br />"We are meeting in Salt Lake City with the <br />Legal Committee of the four Upper Basin States <br />at which my proposed brief will be gone over <br />again and discussed. It takes about two weeks <br />for the contract printer to get the brief out. <br />We will almost have to get the brief to the <br />printer before the first of next week in order <br />to'get it into the hands of the Supreme Court <br />-by December 26." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Will Wyoming pay part of the printing?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.