My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02139
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/21/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: I think not. We have already made our pitch through the <br />congressional delegation. Both Senator Dominick and Senator Haskell <br />are aware of this request. Senator Dominick personally appeared before <br />the Senate Appropriations Committee and requested $100,000 for the <br />Lower Yampa project. I know Senator Haskell has been active also in <br />supporting the request. <br /> <br />~~. Stapleton: All right. Is there any further discussion on the <br />Lower Yampa or Savery-Pot Hook projects? <br /> <br />Let's then go to item number 4, and that will be the flood plain des- <br />ignations. They have been circulated. There is an addition and that <br />is South Boulder Creek. These things I consider pretty well routine. <br />The resolutions are in your folders. Unless you want any discussion, <br />I will entertain a motion that the flood plain designations for Niver <br />Creek in Adams County, Little Dry Creek in Arapahoe County and South <br />Boulder Creek in Boulder County be approved. <br /> <br />~. Ford: I so move. <br /> <br />~. Stapleton: Is there a second? <br /> <br />~. Pickrel: I'll second it. <br /> <br />Nr. Stapleton: <br />any questions? <br /> <br />It has been regularly moved and seconded. <br />Discussion? <br /> <br />Are there <br /> <br />~~. Vandemoer: Larry can answer this quickly. As I understand it, <br />Larry, after we do this it goes back to the commissioners and local <br />people. In other words, sometimes people are pretty upset about this. <br /> <br />~. Sparks: We don't do anything but authorize them to zone if they <br />want to. They don't have to do anything. Their own zoning procedure <br />has to be followed, public hearings and so on, before they adopt an <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />i'llr. Stapleton: <br />by saying "Aye" <br />Appendixes A, B <br /> <br />Any other discussion? <br />- opposed, "no." 'l'he <br />and C). <br /> <br />All those in favor signify by <br />designations are approved. (See <br /> <br />Has everyone in the audience signed the register so we can have your <br />names for attendance? <br /> <br />Now the minimum flow requirements. Larry. <br /> <br />-31- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.