Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 13 that exportations from the Colorado <br />River basin should not exceed an annual average <br />of 320,000 acre-feet by districts organized under <br />that act. This was amended in 1943 Chap. lS2, <br />Colo. S. L. 1943 to read as follows: <br /> <br />_. <br /> <br />'Provided, however, that any works or facili- <br />ties planned and designed for the exporta- <br />tion of water from the natural basin of the <br />Colorado River and its tributaries in Colo- <br />rado by any district created under this Act, <br />shall be subject to the provisions of the <br />Colorado River Compact and the Boulder Canyon <br />Project Act, as amended; that any such works <br />or facilities shall be designed, constructed, <br />and operated in such a manner that the <br />present appropriations of water, and in addi- <br />tion thereto prospective uses of water for <br />irrigation and other beneficial consumptive <br />use purposes, including consumptive uses for <br />domestic, mining and industrial purposes, <br />within the natural basin of the Colorado <br />River in the State of Colorado, from which <br />water is exported, will not be impaired nor <br />increased in cost at the expense of the water <br />users within the said natural basin; and that <br />the facilities and other means for the accom- <br />plishment of said purpose shall be incorporat- <br />ed in, and made a part of. any project plans <br />for the exportation of water from said <br />natural basin in Colorado.'" <br /> <br />The Colorado River Water Conservation Dis- <br />trict urge you, therefore, to refuse approval of <br />the Ft. Collins request for the following reasons: <br /> <br />(1) with the Cache la poudre River at her <br />doorstep, so to speak, and at her command under <br />provisions of Colorado Law with respect to emi- <br />nent domain, Ft. Collins has a good and com- <br />pletely adequate alternative source of water <br />supply for meeting her expanding needs. <br /> <br />(2) In our opinion, approval of this request <br />would repudiate the long standing position of <br />this Board as expressed in Judge Breitenstein's <br />quoted report. <br />