My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02109
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/15/1950
Description
Table of Contents, Minutes and Resolutions. Volumes I and II of Transcription of Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4'7 <br /> <br />the United States GeologioalSurvey after consultation with the <br />Eng1neer1ng staff and Eng1neer1ng Committee on the Upper Col~ <br />ra40 River Comm1ssien, and we Will malte a~llable to your <br />office a copy of that. <br />A.s I understand it, it this apprCllpr1at1on is made. the <br />appropr1ation covers the 11sted stations and the cost of any <br />required installations and the cost of maintenance operat1on <br />will be borne entirely by the Federal Government. <br />MR. HINDERLIDER: In thAt case, it would relieve the <br /> <br />State of Colorado of the present expense ot maintaining thGse <br />stations' <br /> <br />MR. S'fONE:It W1Il. Any stations ~hat are required <br />for the Upper Colorado River Basin Compaotand tor the benefit <br />of the four stations as compact stations will then be assumed <br />by t;he Federal Gover1'1lllent. I think, Gil, 1r you willmalte <br />available to_Hr. H1nder11der a oopy ot that report. <br />MR. McCORMICK: Could each member of the BOllrd haVe-a <br />copy of that reportt <br />HR. S'fONE: 'We will be very glad to .send it out to each <br /> <br />.' ,- ," <br /> <br />member ot the Board. You w11l keep that 1n mind, Mr. Gilder--- <br /> <br />. 'Ii;' <br /> <br />sleeve. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It seems to me that it is entirely a oorrect ooncept <br />that where you have stations tor interstate purposes and serv- <br />ing o.ct Just one state but all the states, it should be bGrne . <br />by the Federal Government, It would be pretty hard to sp11t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.