Laserfiche WebLink
<br />182 <br /> <br />would not go to Washington until after the Secretary of the Interior had made his <br />decision on the objections urged b,y various groups to constructing a reservoir in <br />the Dinosaur National Monument. He further stated that a hearing on these objec- <br />tions would be held in Washington on April 3. <br /> <br />Governor Johnson excused himself from the meeting, and Vice-Chairman Bailey <br />resumed as presiding officer. <br /> <br />The Director reported that the Region 4 report on the Collbran Project had I <br />been submitted to Washington, and that affected states had been given an opportu- <br />mty r" oov1_. with ~ly th, St.t. or Calif=," ootoci", ."" obj.ot1~ to tho . <br />project. 1'he California objection specifically was in regard to use of the in- <br />Iterest component of power revenues, but the Director commented that it seemed <br />\evident that all California objections were aimed principally to preven:f; or delay <br />any developments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />The Director reported he had attended a public hearing at Estes Park on <br />April 26, 1950, in which the local people voiced objection to erect~on of overhead <br />power lines b.1 the Bureau of Reclamation. The Director said he had' taken the <br />position that it was too late to change plans, that construction was already under- <br />way, that program stopr.age would prObably mean damage payments on present contracts, <br />and that it would seem unfair to expect the power and water users to defray the <br />additional cost aggregating an estimated $1,000,000, of putting the' wires under- <br />ground in the area. He explained that provision to meet such situations should be <br />covered by appropriate general legislation and considered when projects are author- <br />ized for construction. . <br /> <br />, It was::'moved by Mr. Cross, and seconded by Mr.' Beaty, <br />that the action taken by the Director at the April 26 <br />hearing at Estes Park be endorsed by the Board. <br /> <br />On vote, the motion was unanimously carried. <br /> <br />On inquiry, it was revealed the Board never has taken a stand opposing the <br />attitude of the National Park Service in restricting or prohibiting' economic wel- <br />fare types of construction in national parks and monuments. Following discussion, <br />it was decided that Byron E. Rogers and Judge Dan H. Hughes would prepare a suit- <br />able resolution, embodying the sentiment of the Board, for the Board to take action <br />upon. <br /> <br />The Director reported that of three recently completed compacts, the State <br />of Colorado was interested in two - the Upper Basin Compact and the Arkansas River <br />Compact. Funds for installation and maintenance of gaging stations on streams <br />affected by these compacts to aid in compact administration are being sought from <br />the Congress. <br /> <br />The series of field meetings being held by the President's Temporary Water <br />Resources Policy Commission, particularly the area hearing to be in Denver June 27 <br />and 28, was discussed. The Director reported that V'dI'ious agencies in the State <br />would file cOJlll!lents with the COlllIllission, and that an effort had been made through <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board to coordinate the statements applying to <br />Colorado. The Director asked that the statement to be submitted by the Colorado <br />Water t,;onservation Board .be reviewed, when ready, by the Board and approved as a <br />rr~tter of policy. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 12:10 o'clock for the noon recess, to be recon- <br />vened at 1:30 o'clock. <br />