Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 4 <br />Project Approach (RFP Section 4.6) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />by each researcher are randomly ch~cked and followed by periodic callbacks to <br />authenticate work performed. This in:).portant function enhances thequaJity control <br />of a project and virtually guarantees the professionalism and consistency of the <br />interviews. ' ' , <br /> <br />There is also an important human/relational side to telephone surveys. With the exception of <br />direct in-person interviews, no other form of research lends itself as well to the high level of <br />personal contact and hence impact on customer relationships and corporate goodwill. No other <br />approach allows the,researcher to as effectively convey the degree to which the respondent's <br />viewpoint,counts as well as the Client's appreciation for the respondent's participation. <br />Furthermore, interviewers can use this opportUnity to relay important inforination, such as <br />drought planning resources and contact information~ as desired by the Client. <br /> <br />Secondary Methodologies <br /> <br />While the Bouvette Consulting Team expects the majority of data to be gathered through <br />telephone surveys, we plan to supplement 01l.r efforts through the use of other methodologies as <br />described below: '- <br /> <br />~ Mail/ Fax: Respondents will be <j.ttempted up to five times by telephone. For <br />those'respondents still not iIlterviewl!daJiter that method, questionnaires will be mailed <br />along with a self-addressed, stamped envelop. The questionnaire itself will be identical <br />,to the telephone instrument, excE!pt for, specialized instructions that guide the . <br />respondent through the process. ThE! same instrument could also or instead be faxed to <br />the respondent and faxed back, if the respondent preferred such a method. <br /> <br />Q E-mailfInternet: In our view, the Internet definitely has its place and is offering <br />more and more interesting research poss~bilities; Under the right conditions, it has the <br />potentW to be among the most accurat~ and cost-effective method of data gathering <br />available. RRMI anticipates that only a small percentage of contacts will have accurate <br />and available e-mail addresses, although we plan to update respondents' records <br />through our research process. However,' for those who have, e.mail addresses, this <br />option will be available too. The e-mail questionnaire will again be identical to the <br />telephone instrument, with speeiaJizE!d instructions. <br /> <br />t Personal Interviews: AchieYihga high response ratE! in the study is a <br />paramount priority for CWCBi therE!fore( if multiple telephone attempts, mail, fax, and <br />e-mail do not realize the required respor!se rate, then a member of our Team may go to <br />the respondent's location to conduct the' interview in person. Though this is the most <br />expensive method of data collection, we anticipate that the collection ,steps outlined <br />above will make personal interviews necessary for only a small sample of the contacts. <br /> <br />More than a decade of experience using mult;iple research methodolOgies has given us the <br />acumen to aChieve the lofty 90% response rate that is targeted for this study. Strong pre-survey <br />outreach will include mailers, e-mail, and prominent endorsements. Well-trained interviewers . <br />will expertly communicate the purpose of the survey and thereby encourage participation. In <br />this manner, even before ,the first call is placed, a base of interested and informed respondents <br /> <br />Section 4, Page 16 <br />