My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02033
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/8/1963
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.J.JIG <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />Getting baGk to the subject matter, the Two <br />Forks and the Tomichi and Ohio Creek, you realize <br />that the area involved in the Ohio Creek and <br />Tomichi is made up of ranchers and, of course, <br />agricultural economy being as it is, I'm sure <br />they could not match dollar for dollar with the <br />City and County of Denver in raising funds to <br />make investigations but I am satisfied that they <br />would go to the fullest extent possible to contri- <br />bute what they possibly can to further this inves- <br />tigation because it is badly needed in that area." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"We intend to ask them for some money, Mr. <br />Peterson." <br /> <br />"It seems to me that the motion I suggested, <br />and that Judge Conour made and Mr. Burr seconded, <br />leaves all these things open. I think Mr. Miller <br />can certainly vote against the resolution but <br />all the resolution does, it spurs the interested <br />people in the various areas to come back with <br />some concrete program as to how to go forward. <br />Nobody says anything in the resolution or has <br />said anything at this meeting that we are going <br />to, in any way, deter these things. It's just an <br />economic problem with us and we're prodding you <br />for additional solutions. <br /> <br />Any further discussion on the motion? All <br />those in favor will signify by saying 'aye'; <br />opposed?" <br /> <br />"For reasons previously stated, I feel con- <br />strained to oppose the resolution." <br /> <br />"I would have to vote no too." <br /> <br />"Motion carried. <br /> <br />I'd like now, just to take another thing <br />out of order, and then we'll get to the regular <br />agenda item~,as some of our people may be leaving <br />before we get to it and I think it's important <br />and that's the June meeting of the Board. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Is this in Item #6 again, Len?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.