My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02033
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/8/1963
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />........vu <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />should be invited so they can help us in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Any further discussion?" <br /> <br />"May I inquire from whoever can give this <br />information, is it necessary that we eliminate <br />Ohio and Tomichi and the Upper South Platte Two <br />Forks at this particular time?" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"We could postpone it I presume until the <br />last meeting of the year which we are going to <br />consider for the last week in June. It seems to <br />me that it's a foregone conclusion there is no <br />way now to restore the budget cuts; it's a <br />question of whether we are going to cut back <br />projects that are already under investigation <br />or not make any new starts until we can resolve <br />these things." <br /> <br />"I 0 m not so familiar with Ohio and Tomichi <br />Creek but Two Forks, of course, has been in the <br />discussion stage and considered by this Board <br />as far back as 30 years ago and I just could not <br />vote for a resolution that shelves Two Forks. <br />I am wondering whether there is some place that <br />we can at least reserve a token amount for both <br />of these projects, the Ohio and Tomichi and the <br />Upper South Platte. One is on one side of the <br />range and the other is on the other and I think <br />it is a mistake to cut them out. I further <br />indicate again that there can be money made <br />available, I am sure, from those effected by <br />the elimination of Two Forks and, while as far <br />as the people I represent they are in no posi- <br />tion to extend a very great amount, I think <br />money can be forthcoming on a voluntary basis <br />to keep the se alive." <br /> <br />"What you are saying is that you would like <br />to have this motion tabled another month or so <br />to find out what the situation is locally as <br />well as any changes before the beginning of the <br />next fiscal year." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I think that's the sense of my comments and <br />I hesitate, at any time, to express a difference <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.