My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02033
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/8/1963
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />JUDGE CONOUR: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. BURR: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />development of the South Platte River and any- <br />thing that can be done to include appropriate <br />studies on the Two Forks and its incorporation <br />into that master plan are vital. Even as Mr. <br />Miller suggests, there is possibly something <br />that may be presented to the Board of Water <br />,Commissioners of Denver of seeking, if other <br />entities are willing to cooperate, perhaps a <br />contribution which would enable this Board to <br />initiate that study and carry it forward." <br /> <br />"Thank you, Nr. ROss. Any further comments <br />from any of our guests? If not, I would like <br />to suggest that maybe we have a motion approv- <br />ing the staff's recommendations with a further <br />proviso that the staff work as closely as <br />possible with the affected areas to see that <br />the delays in these investigations be kept at <br />an absolute minimum." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, I so move." <br /> <br />"Nr. Conour has moved, is there a second?" <br /> <br />"I'll second the motion." <br /> <br />"Mr. Burr has seconded. Is there any fur- <br />ther discussion? l'lr. Kuiper." <br /> <br />"I might say, I think to acknowledge the <br />help that we received from the Colorado Water <br />Congress in the attempt to have these budget <br />cuts restored, was material in getting a further <br />hearing with Senator Locke before the Senate <br />acted on this. Frankly, we presented to him the <br />same arguments that Mr. Peterson has made and <br />that Mr. Miller has made but this did not get <br />through. " <br /> <br />"I would think, in that regard, it might be <br />well to invite Mr. Locke, Senator Locke, to our <br />Board meeting in western Colorado to see just <br />what we do do and some of the problems. I think <br />it's a question of exposure to the Board's work. <br />That is the only thing that's holding this back <br />and I think if we make some plans to go to Craig <br />that some influential members of the Legislature <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.