BOARD02022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I ~ffi. BARNARD, SR.: I .1;:SI~ State of Colorado will have a document from its official State agency related to water policy in reference to the Colorado River and one in which I think you will be able to take a great deal of pride and most certainly you will no longer be in the posi- tion which John, Jr. has frowned on several different times in comment by saying that at one meeting or another where representa- tives of the Board, the Attorney General's office or even the Governor has had to say 'We haven't got the information at hand. We have got to analyze further to have something available'. It will give to you a document, I think, on which you will be perfectly willing to stand. With those comments, I think there are perhaps some details that have gone into the amendments of the document you received at your December meeting and some comments regarding the power analysis that have been done since that time, that can better be made directly from your legal committee represented by John Barnard, Sr. and perhaps by Mr. Keith Millen in reference to the power angles of the problem. John do you want to take it from there?" "Mr. Chairman and members of the Board as Itr. Barkley has reminded you, at a pre- vious meeting, I think the last meeting of the Board, you were provided with what was termed a preliminary report relative to the criteria to be adopted to govern the impounding of water in Glen Canyon Reservoir during its filling period and which also established what we feel to be the proper criteria for the operation of Glen Canyon Reservoir when filled. At that meeting, as Mr. Barkley has said, after it was called to your attention, the fact that the report lacked detailed technical data concerning the hydrology phase of the situation on the generation of power at both Glen Canyon and Hoover Dam, you directed that Mr. McClellan be made avail- able for the purpose of participating in those further studies.