My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02022
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:03 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:07:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/11/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~v/~ <br /> <br />the Colorado River Compact, the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act, the Boulder Canyon <br />Project.Adjustment Act and the power con- <br />tracts at Hoover Dam. That work had <br />progressed to the point where, at your <br />last meeting, the preliminary document was <br />made available to you. We suggested at <br />that time that you authorize your Direc- <br />tor to utilize the services of Mr. McClellan <br />as the consultant to carry the study one <br />step further in the analysis of the power <br />contracts and particularly as those might <br />relate to the position which has been taken <br />by California in reference to the reduction <br />of power through the construction of Glen <br />Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />The stage of that has now reached this <br />point. The final copies have not yet been <br />distributed to the Investigation Commission <br />so that the Commission as a whole has had <br />opportunity to go through the document in <br />full. Your committee has continued its <br />work. Mr. McClellan, the staff of your own <br />Board on the hydrology, together with Mr. <br />Millen from the Public Service Company of <br />Colorado, ~ave pressed on with the analysis <br />of these power elements that were involved <br />in the question and have arrived at the <br />stage now where at least in terms of your <br />own discussion and prior to the opportunity <br />for you gentlemen to have a look at the re- <br />port itself, I think I can safely make this <br />promise. We feel that you will have avail- <br />able to you a document which covers histori- <br />cally the things that have gone into the <br />makeup of the Colorado River Compact and the <br />various documents to which I have referred, <br />that gives to this Board an historical treatise <br />which lets you know what the position of Colo- <br />rado should be. I think there is no question <br />that it supports the resolution which the <br />Board suggested to the Colorado Commissioner <br />for presentation to the Upper Basin Commis- <br />sion. <br /> <br />I feel there is a good possibility that <br />the Board will want to consider the publica- <br />tion and wide distribution of that report <br />since it is put together pretty largely in <br />laymen.'s language so that people of the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.