My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01904
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/8/1952
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />77 <br /> <br />- 5 - <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />felt that that State should get an increase in the amount of storage <br />permitted under the decree in Wyoming and suggested 5,000 acre-feet. <br />The Director explained. that this stipulation also would permit <br />further negotiations and further studies by the Bureau of Reclamation <br />but would provide that, under the terms of the stipulation, the <br />parties to the stipulation would withdraw any objection to the proposed <br />Glendo under Plan F of operation by the Bureau of Reclamation. Final <br />form of this stipulation, he said, was not agreed to at that meeting <br />but Colorado insisted that in order this rratter not be too long delayed, <br />a meeting be definitely fixed and it was agreed to hold the next meeting <br />in Denver on September 10. <br /> <br />Vice-Chairman Bailey and Mr. Hinkley bri efly supplemented the <br />report of. the Director. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey referred to the clause in the stipulation that each of <br />the parties agrees to approve and support the Glendo Project. The <br />question has come up, he said; as to whether negotiators could bind <br />Colorado to that clause or whether that should be decided by the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />Director Stone said he thought it would be helpful and in accordance <br />,lith the usual procedure, when a stipulation which negotiators feel <br />is acceptable is finally written, if he were in a position to say that <br />Colorado cannot finally approve such stipulation until it is first <br />submitted. to, and approved by, the Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />It was moved by George A. Pughe and seconded by M. C. Hinderlider <br />that negotiators in the North Platte matter refer to the Board <br />any proPQsed agreement which might be made for consideration of <br />the Board. <br /> <br />On vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously and was <br />declared adopted. <br /> <br />At this point, Vice-Chairman Bailey announced that Thomas L. <br />Kimball, new Director of the Game and Fish Department, was present and <br />introduced him to the Board. <br /> <br />Mr. Kimball spoke briefly and expressed the desire to cooperate <br />wi th the Board in working out the fish and wildlife problems connected <br />with the various projects. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Director said the Board should make every effort to bring the <br />Game and Fish Department into the study of projects in order that, as <br />a State, we might establish policies, work out procedures and agree <br />upon project development, considering all the effects of water development. <br /> <br />After discussion, it was moved by W. M. Williams and seconded by <br />George A. Pughe that an amendment to the law creating the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board be drafted and submitted to the next <br />session of the Legislature; and that such amendment provide that <br />the Director of the Colorado Game and Fish Department be made <br />ex-officio member of the Water Board. <br /> <br />On vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously and was <br />declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.