Laserfiche WebLink
<br />""%L..c...c.. <br /> <br />apparently reached its low point on April 3rd <br />with an elevation of 1,088.07. <br /> <br />Under general investigations, taking up <br />first, feasibility investigations, the Animas- <br />La plata project is about in the same status I <br />that was reported at the last meeting. It <br />has been transmitted to the Budget Bureau on <br />April 10, 1964, to obtain their views. <br /> <br />The Dolores Project is substantially the <br />same as reported at your last meeting. The <br />last status on that report was that it was <br />adopted by the Secretary on October 3, 1964, <br />and has been sent out for formal comments by <br />states and federal agencies. Comments have <br />been received from the Department of Labor and <br />Commerce, Public Health Service, and the States <br />of Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, Cali- <br />fornia and Utah. <br /> <br />The proposed feasibility report for the <br />Dallas Creek Project has been completed. It <br />is in the printer's hands now and you can look <br />forward to receiving copies of this report <br />within a week's time. This report is being sent <br />out for state-level review, or field-level re- <br />view, and informal comments are being requested. <br /> <br />On the West Divide Project, which is the <br />next project for us to get a report out on, <br />we are now presently securing our final esti- <br />mates and in the process of preparing our ap- <br />pendices. We hope to get this report out early <br />this summer. <br /> <br />I think I previously reported to this <br />Board that we were in the process now of modi- <br />fying the San Miguel Project. The initial plan <br />on this project did not show as good a feasi- I <br />bility as we had hoped for and some modifica- , <br />tion of that report will be necessary to bring <br />it up to providing feasibility. <br /> <br />Our plan formulation studies on Battle- <br />ment Mesa are progressing about on schedule. <br />