My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />1'1R. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETOIli: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. BURR: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />LQ.q.:> <br /> <br />"Has our consultant, Mr. McClellan, been <br />advised of this proceeding? Does he work with <br />you and does he agree with the conclusion you <br />just expressed?" <br /> <br />"Mr. McClellan has worked with us now for two <br />years. He does agree with the position that we <br />have taken. <br /> <br />I might say that a private, reputable <br />national engineering firm was also employed by <br />the federal government and they concurred. I <br />might also add that both the Eisenhower and <br />Kennedy administrations concurred in the all- <br />federal system." <br /> <br />"Referring to this analysis of the poncha <br />Junction-Pueblo transmission line, what is the <br />difference between the one you gave me and the <br />one you are talking about?" <br /> <br />"The substation - we put in the substation <br />which we had left out of the first analysis. I <br />forgot you didn't have the corrected one." <br /> <br />"I'll open it up for discussion among the <br />Board first, if I may. Mr. Peterson." <br /> <br />"I would like to make a motion, Mr. President, <br />and if it is seconded, I think we can open it <br />up for discussion. Is that proper?" <br /> <br />"I think so." <br /> <br />"That being the case, I would move that this <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board go on record <br />as approving the recommending of the all-federal <br />transmission system as proposed by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and in addition, an extension of the <br />line from Sigurd to Central Utah, as part of the <br />all-federal transmission system." <br /> <br />"It has been moved. Do I hear a second?" <br /> <br />"I'll second the motion." <br /> <br />"It has been regularly moved and seconded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.