Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />was distributed to Board members by Mr. McDonald. <br /> <br />In light <br /> <br />of the fact that the draft minutes were rather lengthy and <br /> <br />were being provided to Board members for the fIrst time, it <br /> <br />was agreed that Board members would review the draft at a <br />~ <br /> <br />later date1 provide any comments which they might have to <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald, whereupon the minutes would be finalized and <br /> <br />presented for approval at the next Board meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeger then asked Mr. McDonald to proceed with <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2 concerning applications for feasibility studies <br /> <br />to be funded with monies from the construction fund. Mr. <br /> <br />McDonald called the Board's attention to his memorandum <br /> <br />concerning this agenda item (see Appendix B). Mr. McDonald <br /> <br />noted that there were about two dozen applications for <br /> <br />feasibility studies pending at the time, approximately haif <br /> <br />of which had been calendared fo~ this Board meeting, and the <br /> <br />baiance of the applications to be taken up at the July Board <br />meeting. Before proceeding with the~aff's recommendations <br /> <br />for each individual application, Mr. McDonaid provided the <br /> <br />Board with an overview of the $tatus of the General <br /> <br />Assembiy's deliberations concerning the Board's recentiy <br /> <br />adopted construction fund policies. Mr. McDonald noted that <br /> <br />those policies had been incorporated nearly verbatim in the <br /> <br />House passed version of H.B. 439. He related to the Board <br /> <br />that there had been considerable debate on the floor of the <br /> <br />House of Representatives concerning the perceived faiiure of <br /> <br />the Board to pursue and recommend to the General Assembly <br /> <br />large new water development projects. He noted that the <br />