My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01700
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/1961
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2684 <br /> <br />Now remember Arizona is not a participating <br />state in our Basin Project. Through a series <br />of conferences with Arizona, and with the help <br />of our power people from the State of Colorado <br />and from the Public service company, in our <br />office downstairs we agreed with the State of <br />Arizona on certain marketing arrangements of <br />project power. We in effect agreed to request <br />the Secretary to make an allocation of a sub- <br />stantial amount of project power to Arizona. <br />They wanted it desperately in the phoenix area. <br />We reached an amiable agreement with the Stat~ <br />of Arizona on that proposition, so that they po <br />get substantial power from the Project. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Now, at this time, there are certain in- <br />terests in the State of Arizona who say 'We'll <br />take the power but now we want you and the <br />states in the Upper Basin to pay us taxes on it'. <br />There have been cartoons and other articles <br />appearing in the Arizona newspapers belaboring <br />us because we are now not willing to pay them' <br />taxes. Taxes, of course, come out of the Basin <br />Fund. Any taxes which are paid to anyone can <br />only come from one source - the Basin Fund. <br />That's the campaign, and it's very effective. <br />You approach the County Commissioners and they <br />say 'Oh, yes, we'd like to have some more mon~y'. <br />Well, we would like to have some more money i~ <br />Colorado too. ' <br /> <br />That brings me to a further illustration: <br />I think that at some time the people of Colorado <br />are going to have to draw a line concerning their <br />rights. We started out in 1922 with 60 perce~t <br />of the flow of the Colorado River at the Inter- <br />national Boundary at Mexico. vfuen we got ~ <br />through with the Colorado River Compact and the <br />Upper Colorado River Compact, we had 22 perce~t <br />left. I'll turn to another proposition. The <br />Upper Colorado River Compact is purely among the <br />Upper Basin States. The virgin flow at Lee <br />Ferry (this does not involve the Lower Basin) <br />but at Lee Ferry only, as among the Upper Basin <br />States, we contribute 70 percent of the flow. <br />Then when we got into a compact in 1948, we com- <br />promised and accepted 52 percent of the water. . <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.