My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01700
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/1961
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Lb1::S3 <br /> <br />all-federal line would lose money and would not <br />start showing a profit until sometime after <br />1970. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The same thing holds true, in certain de- <br />grees, in utah and New Mexico. There are advan- <br />tageous arrangements which can be made which <br />will make money for the project and will make <br />money for these investor utilities. <br /> <br />We think that this line to Sigurd must go <br />on up to Hebert. This is an incomplete system <br />as far as we are concerned and reduction should <br />take place in these lines in northwestern Colo- <br />rado. Now those are fertile fields of investi- <br />gation which we think will reduce the proposed <br />federal investment and put a good many million <br />dollars more in our Project Fund. <br /> <br />I think, as far as our own Public Service <br />Company is concerned, there will be no difficulty <br />in arriving at some mutually satisfactory ar- <br />rangements. Mr. Sargent has told me that he <br />cannot speak for these other companies, which <br />is true, although he has been speaking for them <br />to some extent in the past. But these are <br />different matters. All we ask is that we look <br />at this line piece by piece. The way_you. <br />handle any business arrangement and not as a <br />'package'. We don't like this shell game when we <br />get on this portion of the line. We don't want <br />to say 'Let's don't look at this, look at the <br />whole thing'. That's not the way we intend to <br />do business on our staff. We want each of <br />these lines analyzed and that means we must get <br />the cooperation of the Bureau of Reclamation on <br />this. As I say, we have not been satisfied with <br />the information we have received to date. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />So it appears to us that there is a fer- <br />tile field during the next year wherein these <br />controversies can be resolved. <br /> <br />One other thing that I would like to point <br />out in connection with the campaign that is now <br />going on down in the State of Arizona. People <br />from Arizona wanted part of this project power. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.