My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01700
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/1961
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2680 <br /> <br />in your folders a rough copy of an analysis <br />which we prepared using a common basis, that <br />is, a fifty-year interconnected system - using <br />the figures furnished to us by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and by the investor utilities. <br />You will note that under this fifty-year analy- <br />sis the combined system figures out at $479 <br />million, the modified federal system at $437 <br />million. There is a considerable difference <br />in favor of the federal system. When you <br />project it beyond fifty years, the difference <br />becomes astronomical in favor of the all-federal <br />system. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We do not claim to have any particular <br />insight into these problems. If this analysis <br />is wrong, and it could well be, what we would <br />like to do is to sit down with both the Bureau <br />of Reclamation and investor utility companies <br />and to discuss these items which we have set <br />forth here, item by item. Not by package as <br />has been the previous procedure. Actually we <br />feel that the Bureau cost can be reduced fur- <br />ther by substituting certain items of the <br />utility companies' proposal. On the other <br />hand, the utilities costs cannot be reduced <br />unless they agree to reduce them. These are <br />their own figures and to date they have never <br />made any offer to reduce these figures. The <br />so-called new offer that you have heard about <br />was a proposal that took place after this <br />period of time and we believe was a substantial <br />concession on the part of the investor utili- <br />ties, if we could understand it. Again to <br />date, no one has offered to explain what the <br />proposals meant. Actually, the proposal has <br />never been made. The proper authority, in <br />this case, is the Secretary of the Interior. <br />No proposal has ever been made to the Secretary <br />of the Interior other than was made many months <br />ago. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We prepared, at the request of one of our <br />Congressmen, our analysis of fields of future <br />investigation wherein improvements could come <br />about in any system that is now presented. <br /> <br />y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.