My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01700
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/1961
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />L:OO.L <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Substantially our criteria was this: if there <br />is to be construction of a transmission line <br />which utilizes entirely only project power then <br />this line must be constructed by the federal <br />government. We arrive at that conclusion from <br />very simple arithmetic. There is no mystery <br />about it. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />When the federal government buys telephone <br />poles, steel, or what have you, and buys trans- <br />mission lines, it buys those lines and poles <br />from the same person and at the same cost that <br />the utility companies would purchase them. When <br />the government lets a contract for the construc- <br />tion of lines, this is done by private indivi- <br />duals - private contractors - the same way that <br />the utilities co~anies handle their construc- <br />tion. So that if you have the same type of con- <br />struction in the same area, you get the same <br />price. Neither the federal government nor these <br />investor utilities construct the lines. They <br />are constructed by private contractors. So it <br />is absurd to argue that it will cost the federal <br />government more to do the same job. It is just <br />not a fact. ~lhen you put on top of that that <br />the investor utilities must borrow money at <br />something like 6% as compared to the government <br />rate of 2.78%, you have an additional factor <br />immediately that must go into the amortization <br />of that line as far as the investor utilities <br />are concerned. Then you must put in a prof~t. <br />These companies are organized for profit, and <br />properly so. They are controlled by the v~rious <br />regulatory agencies of the United states and the <br />states. So you have interest plus profit which <br />immediately increases the cost to the investor <br />utilities, plus taxes. When you compute those <br />items then, we find that on the same lines the <br />investor utilities must have a 12% plus return <br />annually, on a fifty-year basis, to pay the cost <br />of the lines. The federal government needs 5.6% <br />return. So it costs more than 100% more for the <br />investor utilities to operate that line than it <br />does the federal government. There's no mystery <br />about it. It's just simple arithmetic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.