My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01683
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/12/1967
Description
Agenda, Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />u <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />..J..J..J..J <br /> <br />SENATOR LOCI<E: <br /> <br />"I'd like to come up here and express <br />some of the ideas that "Ie have been eJcpress- <br />ing at some of our local water meetings. I <br />think this, it is really a pleasure, you know, <br />to have the Water Conservation Board meet <br />among the areas that are above what we normally <br />call the pumping situation. I think it has <br />been eJcpressed, over the months that we have <br />been holding these meetings, that there is not <br />the animosity, possibly, towards pumpers. But <br />we think that we should have a little bit <br />better break on the administration of the <br />waters on the upper regions of both the rivers, <br />the Platte and the Ar]cansas. <br /> <br />I want to comment on something that was <br />discussed yesterday in a water meeting at <br />Salida. We learned about a small area, some <br />46,000 acres that was in productive agricul- <br />ture, and over a period of about ten or twelve <br />years or maybe a little longer, the area has <br />been reduced by one-fourth. Ten thousand acres <br />have been taken out of active production. Now <br />you can see what that does to the economy of <br />any area. I do not have the figures for the <br />Canon city area but I wouldn't be a bit sur- <br />prised but what you would find that there have <br />been many acres taken out of active production <br />here also. Again, that really hurts the economy <br />of an area. <br /> <br />I think this has all been brought about, <br />if you want to study the flows of water and I <br />am sure you do, over a period of years. At <br />this particular time of the year there is not <br />too much difference, but let's take about 30 <br />days back when the water calls were put on for <br />about 1874. Then the \~ater flowed do\~n the <br />stream and nowhere did anybody along the line <br />get a crack at this water. what happens is <br />this - if that water was used, we know then <br />that it would create a certain amount of re- <br />charge in the area and they'd get it down below. <br />You have heard me say this before. I've intro- <br />duced legislation with that in mind, of using <br />water in the upper regions because you are going <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.