Laserfiche WebLink
<br />198 <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher: I move the question on the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: We have an authorizing resolution attached to <br />the contract. <br /> <br />Mr. Moses said Assistant Secretary should be inserte~ in the <br />last line. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Itr. Bailey said the motion was the ad?ption of the resolution, <br />which motion was carried. <br /> <br />Motion to approve the contract was carried. <br /> <br />6. Senate Bill 120 activities. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: Item 3, Report on Senate Bill 120 activities. <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford: After the last meeting"the Vice-Chair~an and <br />the Director went to the Governor. He assured us of his interest <br />and cooperation and suggested I write fiim a letter, which I did. <br />we have not received any money yet, but Mr. Brown says the request <br />is approved and that it merely means writing a letter. We have <br />come this far: " Application forms are made up for well drillers, the <br />bond is completed but has to have the approval from Surety companies <br />in the East. The Attorney General's office is working in connection <br />vdth preparing these forms. We have had fine cooperation from that <br />office. <br /> <br />7. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation District. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: Item 4, Resolution from Southwestern Colorado <br />Water Conservation District. <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford read the resolution; <br /> <br />THE SOJTH1~~STERN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT <br /> <br />Durango, Colorado <br />April 29, 1953 <br /> <br />Mr. I. C. Crawford <br />Director of Colorado State Water Cons. Board <br />Room 212, State Office Bldg., <br />Denver 2, Colo. <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Crawford: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />At a meeting of the Southwest Water Conservation District, held <br />April 28, 1953, the Board of Directors adopted the follovdpg <br />resolution: <br />BE IT RESOLVED - that we, the Board of Directors of the <br />Southwest Water Conservation District protest to the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board against the San Juan - Chama Transmountain <br />Diversion Project for the following reasons: <br />