Laserfiche WebLink
<br />b:JU <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"Perhaps Mr. Whitten can devise <br />some better way of saying that." <br /> <br />JllR. BARNARD: <br /> <br />"If the Engineer thinks it better <br />to say just a three inch well, we <br />will work it out that way. <br /> <br />Now in that Section 10, again the <br />last words should be 'except section 11' <br />instead of 'except section 12'. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I think that is all the changes <br />recommended to the draft you have. <br />We feel very definitely that the amount <br />of .work that has gone into this bill <br />and its careful language makes it the <br />better vehicle to accomplish t~e Boarq's <br />general recommendations. However, we <br />feel that we should not recommend a <br />specific bill but merely recommend <br />these principles as embodied:in either <br />of these bills. We should amend Sena- <br />tor Gill's bill as recommended above <br />and then either one of these bills <br />win be acceptable to the policy of <br />the Board." <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"This is a practical question - <br />you have raised the filing fee to <br />$10.00 and it is to be paid to the <br />State Engineer's office but the sur- <br />veys, hearings, etc., are going to <br />be held by the Board. How are we <br />going to get that money from the State <br />Engineer?" <br /> <br />MR. BARNARD: <br /> <br />"Experience has indicated in many <br />state agencies that earmarked funds <br />create a great many problems. The pro- <br />visions of this bill, as we have it <br />amended, does not include any appro- <br />priations, and requires that the fees <br />go into the genera 1 fund." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />}1m. BARNARD: <br /> <br />"Has anyone talked with anyone <br />on the Appropriations Committee to see <br />what the chances are to get any money?" <br /> <br />"I think Mr. Whitten mentioned <br />that very thing in the committee. I <br /> <br />HR. !c\OSES: <br />