Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. I<ROEGER: <br /> <br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />MR. I<ROEGER: <br /> <br />principles involved in these bills. After <br />hearing the testimony and various comments <br />at the various hearings in the legislature, <br />I don't think people are ready to adopt some <br />of these things. I think it is well that <br />these things are out on the table for people <br />to think about, study, and perhaps in sub- <br />sequent legislation we will get some of them <br />passed. But you have a year or maybe two to <br />kick these things around and think about them <br />so I think our big problem now is getting <br />something on this basic legislation, inte- <br />grating groundwater and surface water. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />So hopefully we can get these two <br />parties together before next Tuesday because <br />the hearings have been postponed now. The <br />next hearing we have in the legislature is <br />next Tuesday. That doesn't give us much <br />time but hopefully we can resolve these <br />things in the cage. That.would be my pro- <br />posal." <br /> <br />"Thank you. <br /> <br />In discussing this matter with Mr. Sparks <br />and Mr. Ten Eyck. I had concluded that we <br />had fairly well arrived at a comPFomise, at <br />a concensus of opinion. I hope, Jimmy, that <br />what I've heard from you this morning wouldn't <br />indicate that there is any major difference <br />in the thoughts." <br /> <br />"That's correct." <br /> <br />"I think that if the water interests. of <br />Colorado are to be represented and if the <br />State Water Board is to exert any influence <br />at all in the legislation that comes out of <br />this session, then certainly we must have <br />unanimous understandiI)g of.the principles <br />that are going to be written into this bill. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Are there members of the Board who would <br />like to ask questions or make comments? <br />