My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01477
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/5/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />"We've had one meeting which, I think, <br />followed the directive of this Board since <br />our last meeting. That was in the Governor's <br />office and I think it was a very profitable <br />meeting. We resolved what I thought to be <br />the big difference in these two bills; that <br />is, the commission as opposed to the divi- <br />sion engineer's ruling in the first instance <br />on an application for a water right. <br /> <br />We've combined the two and I like the <br />combination much better than either one in <br />the original proposals. <br /> <br />There seems to be a difference of opin- <br />ion on how similar the two bills are from <br />there on. I thought they were pretty much <br />alike. They certainly seek the same objec- <br />tives. I am not a lawyer and I don't under- <br />stand a lot of this legal jargon but it seems <br />to me that if the two parties that wrote <br />these two different bills could get together, <br />I think somebody suggested we put them in a <br />cage and not let them out until they come <br />out with a single bill, maybe that is what <br />we will have to do. I think it would be <br />very profitable for these two parties to get <br />together and hopefully Mr. Ten Eyck, and I <br />would like to sit in on it, to go over these <br />two bills, article by article and see where <br />the difference is. I am sure we could com- <br />promise on a bill which we could all support. <br /> <br />I think if we go into the legislature <br />with two bills I don't believe we'll get <br />anything. <br /> <br />I might taik some on the other seven <br />bills. I think the seven bills that went <br />in - were there seven or eight, Jim?" <br /> <br />"Seven. II <br /> <br />"The seven bills that went in with Senate <br />Bill 81, I think there are some very good <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.