My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01321
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/7/1961
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />MR. JENNINGS: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. MC CANDLESS: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. MC CANDLESS: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br /> MR. PETERSON: <br />1 MR. STAPLETON: <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />determine whether it's going to be a main stem <br />project as such, or a participating project, <br />or the extent of Utah's participation. During <br />this year this Board will have to arrive at <br />a decision as to how to fit the Juniper in <br />with our program. Bob, could you give us <br />some idea as to when the Bureau is going to <br />be ready on that?" <br /> <br />"The last I heard there was about a two <br />months delay on getting that report out. As <br />I understand it, to meet the schedule in here, <br />it will be delayed about two months from the <br />original date." <br /> <br />"That's not too long and the matter will <br />be thrown squarely in the laps of this Board <br />for a decision on the Juniper. Before that <br />we are going to have to have the report. It <br />is going to have to be carefully gone over by <br />the Board members and then we'll have to make <br />a decision." <br /> <br />"It had the No. 2 priority in my district <br />above the Yellow Jacket." <br /> <br />"That's very true. But if you will re- <br />call, it was never scheduled at any time in <br />these feasibility investigations and we do <br />not have the information on it." <br /> <br />"That's right." <br /> <br />"Now we have to worry about scheduling <br />it after we get this report." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />" Mr. Peterson." <br /> <br />"with respect to the reconnaissance re- <br />ports and the feasibility reports, or author- <br />izing reports, it seems to me that there is <br />a great deal of delay from the time the <br />reconnaissance report is out until such time <br />as they can start on the feasibility report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.