My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01250
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:22 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:51:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/9/1964
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />q..LV::J <br /> <br />to see if we can increase and make this report <br />a little more attractive. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Feasibility investigation was initiated <br />this fiscal year on the Upper Gunnison Project. <br />It's moving ahead. We are substantially on <br />schedule as far as our other investigations on <br />the Battlement Mesa, Bluestone, Grand Mesa and <br />Yellow Jacket Projects. <br /> <br />Going on to Advance Planning, Congress, in <br />one of their last actions before they adjourned, <br />did give us authorization to secure funds from <br />other projects for the Bostwick Park and Fruit- <br />land Mesa projects. I am happy to report that <br />we have secured funds on those two projects so <br />that we can proceed with advance planning work <br />on both of these projects. It is anticipated <br />that as far as Bostwick Park Project is con- <br />cerned, we can probably complete the repayment <br />negotiations and get our design data in shape <br />so that we can start work on that project proba- <br />bly a year from this coming spring. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We were disappointed that we did not get <br />authority to spend any money on the Savery-Pot <br />Hook Project. I think this was principally <br />due to the fact that on this project we do <br />have problems on land equivalents, size of <br />farm. In the hearings it was testified that <br />results from the Seedskedee development farm <br />should be used in arriving at a solution of <br />these problems and that we were to report to <br />the committees of Congress on our findings on <br />those matters. The problem on the Savery-Pot <br />Hook is the greatest and it will be sometime <br />before this information is available from the <br />development farm and I think that is probably <br />the reason we were not given authority to try <br />to secure funds for this project. <br /> <br />I might say that the funds were not given <br />to us as a budget item as they have been in the <br />past, but rather we were given a 'hunting <br />license' where we could take funds from other <br />projects if they were available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.