My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01227
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:51:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/16/1949
Description
Table of Contents, Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />160 <br /> <br />(EXECUTIVE SESSION) <br /> <br />Upon conclusion of the Executive Session, the Board proceeded with other <br />items of the meeting agenda. <br /> <br />The Director reported that he had received a letter from James Merrick, <br />Superintendent of Buildings, in which it was announced that the Division of Public <br />Buildings would no longer assume payment of fire insurance on property other than I, <br />buildings, and that each State department would be required to pay the premiums <br />for its fire insurance. He reported that fire insurance coverage 'in the amount of <br />$10,000 would be ample for the protection of the property of the Board. 'Heopro- <br />posed that a policy be secured to cover the period of the present biennium, and <br />reported that a premium estimate of $5.14 per thousand for the two-year period had <br />been received. <br /> <br />It was moved by Mr. Williams that the Board approve fire <br />insurance coverage of property o'f the Colorado Water Conservationn <> <br />Board for the two-year period, as outlined by the Director, and <br />that the Director be authorized to approve vouchers 'therefor. The <br />motion was seconded by Mr. Headlee. <br /> <br />On vote, the motion carried, and was declared unanimously adopted. <br /> <br />The Director resubmitte d the matter of the pl.yment of $400 to John C. <br />Page of Denver, Colorado, for services rendered by him as special consulting engi- <br />neer for the Board. The" Board, at its previous meeting had approved the payment <br />to Mr. Page, but a state voucher had not yet 'been issued, ina~ubh as the Governor <br />had recoJllinended further consideration of the matter by the Board. This reconnnenda- <br />tion of the Chief Executive was based upon the fact that no written contract be- <br />tween the Board and John C. Page had been made in compliance with the ~ontroller's <br />Act of the State. Some action by the Doard, in view of this situation, was necessary <br />before' a voucher for the payment of the $400 to John C. Page could be approved by <br />responsible State officials. <br /> <br />It was moved by Mr. Peaty, and seconded by Mr. Smith, that <br />the Director be authorized to execute, on behalf of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board, a contract with John C. Fage for special <br />engineering consulting services in the amount of $400, such contract <br />being subject to approval and final execution in accordance with the <br />'Controller's Act. <br /> <br />.J <br /> <br />"On vote, the motion was unanimously carried, and declared adopted. <br /> <br />The Director discussed the matter of the selection of a Chief Engi,.,~ ,_' <br />neer for the Board. He told what developments had occurred in the endeavor to employ <br />John C. Erickson as Chief Engineer. The proposition did not materialize, as the <br />Civil Service Conunission did not approve a pl.y bracket high enough to ob:t;ain the <br />services of Mr. Erickson. <br /> <br />Almost at the same time, the Director said, it became known that R. M. <br />Gildersleeve, ranking engineer on the Water Board staff, was considering resigning <br />to accept a Federal position, at a salary greater than that afforded him in his <br />present State employment. Mr. Gildersleeve had previously heen considered for the <br />position of Chief Engineer. Tlie Director reported that Mr. Gildersleeve was nON <br />being reconunended for appointment as Chief Engineer of the Board. He said that <br />final review of the position by the Civil Service Commission and Mr. Gildersleeve <br />as the candidate therefor was still in process. <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.