My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01164
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/2006
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado Foundation for Water Education Director Resigns: On Feb IS, Karla Brown tendered her <br />resignation as director as the Colorado Foundation for Water Education. Ms. Brown has announced that <br />she and her husband have been offered an opportunity to live in Europc over the Summer and Fall of <br />2006, and that in order to assist during the upcoming transition process, that her last day will be June 19th. <br /> <br />Arkansas RIver Basin <br /> <br />District Drafts PSOP Legislation for Area Review: Proposed legislation concerning the Preferred <br />Storage Options Plan (PSOP) for the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project was introduced to the Southeastern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District on Jan 19th, specifically addressing a feasibility study and future <br />negotiations with Aurora on storage. <br /> <br />The legislation was introduced by W.R. Stealey, SECWCD president, during the board of directors <br />meeting. It was written by Stealey and Lee MilIer, the district's attorney. It specifically addresses a <br />feasibility study on the enlargement ofFryingpan-Arkansas Project facilities and the long-term <br />contracting provisions and the long-term water needs for the area served by the Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project. <br /> <br />PSOP legislation to date has not been successful in Washington because the entities within the basin- <br />and those entities like Aurora that pay to store and move water out of the basin - have not been able to <br />agree on the language of previously written drafts. Colorado's Congressional delegation has made it clear <br />that they won't support a bilI that their constituents back in Colorado can't agree on. <br /> <br />Specifically, the legislation states, "the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation, is <br />authorized to conduct a feasibility study to determine the most feasible method of meeting the present and <br />future water supply and related storage requirements within the area served by the Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project, including the potential enlargement ofFryingpan-Arkansas facilities." <br /> <br />The feasibility study, the legislation said, will include evaluation of existing and potential water supplies, <br />uses and management; identifying major water-related impacts, including environmental impacts such as <br />water quality and wildlife habitat, water supply, social, cultural, recreation and economic impacts; <br />evaluating opportunities to resolve the impacts referred to (in the above section); evaluating options for <br />implementation of resolutions to the impacts and evaluating the cumulative effect of the conclusions <br />reached based on the evaluation of (A-D) on the area served by the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and the <br />natural basin of the Arkansas River within Colorado, using as a baseline the water supply conditions in <br />1986. <br /> <br />The legislation also states that before funds are expended for the study authorized, the Southeastern <br />Colorado Water Activity Enterprise shall first agree to participate in the feasibility study and to fund, at a <br />minimum, SO percent of the costs of such study. <br /> <br />Funds authorized to be appropriated to conduct the feasibility study will be $4 million. The legislation <br />also addresses such issues as entering into contracts for the use of excess storage and the use of excess <br />capacity for diverting, storing, impounding pumping, exchanging or conveying nonproject water for <br />irrigation, domestic, municipal and industrial, or any other beneficial purpose within the natural basin of <br />the Arkansas River within Colorado. Specifically addressed is the Secretary of Interior's ability to enter <br />into new and renewal contracts with Aurora. <br /> <br />Ditch Companies Respond to Fountain Creek Reservoir Proposal: On Feb 3, the CWCB received a <br />copy of a letter from The Fort Lyon Canal Company, Holbrook Mutual Irrigating Company, Amity <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.