My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01151
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/28/2003
Description
CF Section - New Project Loans Victor & Margie Quint
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />Victor and Margie Quint <br />July 28-30, 2003 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 21g <br /> <br />Water Rlahts . <br />The Quint Farm receives water from 48 shares of Lower Platte and Beaver Canal Company, <br />and 378 shares of Johnson and Edwards Ditch Company. The Lower Platte shares typically <br />provide about 220 acre-feet and the Johnson Edwards shares typically provide about 2,180 <br />acre-feet, for a total of 2,400 acre-feet per year. This ditch water is used to irrigate 350 acres. <br /> <br />The Quint Farm also has decrees on 4 active wells that are used to irrigate 390 acres. These <br />wells are currently augmented through GASP. The Quint Farm pumps on average <br />approximately 1,000 acre-feet of water per year through these 4 wells, creating approximately <br />500 acre-feet of depletions. <br /> <br />The Quints are applying for an augmentation water right for this project, which would allow them <br />to generate approximately 1 ,200 acre-feet of accretions per year. This would be used to cover <br />the depletions of their 4 junior wells, as well as provide additional accretions that could be sold <br />to others. <br /> <br />Proiect DescriDtion <br />Three alternatives were analyzed in the feasibility study: <br /> <br />1) Don't build a project. Continue to rely solely upon GASP for augmentation. <br /> <br />2) Purchase a senior water right and use it for augmentation. <br /> <br />3) Construct the Quint Augmentation Site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternative 1: "Don't build a project. Continue to rely solely upon GASP for augmentation." is <br />not a feasible alternative. The Quint Farm would continue to depend on GASP for <br />augmentation, and upon supplies secured by GASP on a one-year lease basis. If any of these <br />leases are not renewed or cannot be renewed because of the drought, the Quint Farm could <br />not operate its wells. This would be an annual loss of approximately 1,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Alternative 2: "Purchase a senior water right and use.it for augmentation." The Quint Farm <br />could purchase shares of Prewitt Reservoir water for augmentation. Prewitt shares are selling <br />for $15,000 or approximately $1,000 per acre-foot. This alternative would cost well over <br />$1,000,000. <br /> <br />Alternative 3, Construct the Quint Augmentation Site. This would generate the needed <br />augmentation credits by using the recharge well to fill the recharge pond during the winter <br />months when there is generally not a call on the river. Water from the pond would return to the <br />river by underground percolation during the summer time while the Quint Farm has depletions <br />that need to be offset with augmentation water, The cost of this alternative is $95,000, and it is <br />the preferred alternative. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.