My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01119
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:22 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/11/1965
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-r~ VV <br /> <br />of it will certainly have their right to express <br />themselves later to not only this Board but to <br />the Legislature. I think all we are doing, as <br />I see it, is reaffirming (at least reaffirming <br />is my thought) that this water is the property <br />of the public dedicated to its use. This is I <br />about all this proposed act does, in my opinion, <br />and I don't think it in any way hurts any future <br />action by the Legislature. If this were going <br />to do anything further than that I am sure you <br />would have had substantial discussion from not <br />only members of the Board but from members of <br />the audience about how this is to be implemented. <br />But I think, generally, the lack of discussion <br />indicates to me that this in no way deters <br />anybody from advocating what they want but <br />merely indicates that water is the property of <br />the public for the public's use." <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"Mr. Goodwin, I have also heard this theory <br />that you have expressed, that this may in some <br />way create some rights in other states. I am <br />at a total loss to understand the reasoning <br />behind such a theory. Water is allocated based <br />upon agreements between the states, and our <br />rights and obligations are already fixed by these <br />compacts. To the Lower Basin, for instance, we <br />have to deliver 75 million acre-feet of water in <br />any consecutive ten-year period at Lee Ferry. <br />That's all. Now whether the water is surface <br />or ground water is immaterial as long as we <br />deliver that volume of water. As a matter of <br />fact, much of that water that is delivered was <br />ground water at one time because in our high <br />mountain ranges, particularly in the slide rock <br />areas, the streams are fed from so-called springs <br />which percolate under ground." <br /> <br />MR. GOODWIN: <br /> <br />"Well, Larry, the only reason I bring this <br />thing up is that there could be a reopening of <br />our allocation of water and I think we should <br />be a little bit careful. We think we are pro- <br />tected now but there is nothing in the world to <br />keep Uncle Sam or somebody else from saying <br />'You've got to renegotiate, reopen, this thing <br />has never been just right.'. So you might be <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.