My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 01/14/1985
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
Board Meeting 01/14/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/14/1985
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e. Case No. 5-84 CW334 - Larry and Dana Darien. Rapid <br />Creek <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer moved. seconded by Mr. Getches. that <br />the Board ratify the Statement of Opposition filed on the <br />Board's behalf and instruct the staff to continue working with <br />the applicant to ensure that 2 cfs of the Board's original 4 <br />cfs is protected from injury. Motion adopted unanimously. <br /> <br />2. Ratification of Stipulations <br /> <br />a. Case No. 1-82 CW305 - Louisville. South Boulder <br />Creek <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer moved. seconded by Mr. Smith. that <br />the Board ratify the proposed stipulation and authorize the <br />staff to maintain the Entry of Appearance until such time as <br />the stipulated decree is executed. Motion adopted unanimously. <br /> <br />b. Case No. 1-80 CW468- City of Lafayette. South <br />Boulder Creek <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In its memorandum to the Board dated January 7. <br />1985. the staff had recommended that the Board ratify the <br />proposed stipulation. expecting finalization of language by the <br />time of the Board meeting. However. language had not been <br />finalized prior to the meeting on January 14. 1985. and the <br />staff recommended no action be taken and the proposed <br />stipulation be tabled. Mr. Lochhead moved. seconded by Mr. <br />Smith. that the case be tabled. The motion was adopted by <br />unanimous vote. <br /> <br />On the following day (January 15. 1985). Mr. Jeff <br />Kahn of the Attorney General's staff recommended that the Board <br />approve the concept of the stipulation and authorize the staff <br />to work with the applicant and the State Engineer to finalize <br />the precise language. If language agreeable to the applicant <br />and the State Engineer can be firmed up. the Director will be <br />authorized to sign-off for the Board. If no agreement can be <br />reached. then the staff is authorized to proceed to trial. <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer moved. seconded by <br />the Board accept Mr. Kahn's recommendation. <br />adopted unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith. that <br />The motion was <br /> <br />3. Informational Items <br /> <br />Mr. Jencsok discussed two subjects under this heading. <br /> <br />namely: <br /> <br />a. Request for instream flow application for scenic <br />value. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.