My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01045
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:49:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/27/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I would offer that as a motion. <br /> <br />, ~ <br />MR. STAPLETON: , Is there a second to that motion?- <br /> <br />. ' <br />MR. FETCHER: I will second the motion. <br /> <br />~ <br />- . <br />MR. STAPLETON: Any discussion on the motion? - Mr. :Sherman. <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: :For :cl-ari--fication, . Bob:, you 'want the Governor to includ,e <br />in his -statement the points-you have just raised; is that correct? - <br />- ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"- '. - - <br />MR. -JACKSON: - Harris, ,I would really like .him to offer -this motion, were <br />-it to: be approved, just as.'a statement of the policy'of the State. 1'_' <br />am really:concerned that if we try-to answer, each Qne of these -- and <br />we are not:going to be given time,: apparently; to prepare our answers -- <br />we are going to fall -into the trap'of approving what is basically a bad <br />statement. - There isn't anY'.question that this so-called : "National Plan" <br />does pre-empt state water law. I think we are going to b~ the recipients <br />of the worst of it. <br /> <br />~ <br />.. <br />~ tell you that:it really bothers me. I think we will be: on the receiving <br />end of the :bad _things that the eastern s,tates will really not notice on <br />the federal projects. :They will probably notice that, but the water law <br />they ,will not' be :hurt by _like we are':.:' . <br /> <br />I think we need to get:out early with a statement that we- are enormously <br />concerned with the impact on our water lawand,water,rights. And then <br />we could meet with our congressional delegation. perhaps Larry could <br />'meet with 'them and bring: them' up to date. <br /> <br />- . . <br />MR. SHERMAN: I~just finishedtalking:with the GovernQr on this'very <br />issue. Larry has prepared an initial draft ,and statement for the ' <br />Governor. I have be,en working with the Governor on that draft. . <br /> <br />. k _.'. <br />I think the point-you have raised here, Bob~ iS2all going to be included <br />in ,this statement. I don't think: there:is any.question about that. -,I <br />think he will hit.on those points very ,hard. - There 'may be other, points: <br />as well that he will focus on. <br /> <br />I certainly' haye no-objection to the ,motion. But I just want to assure <br />you that the matter is being considered carefully. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: - Hopefully, strongly. <br /> <br />- - - <br />MR. SHERMA'N: It will be a strong statement. <br />about'it. It might not be quite as strong as <br />(Laughter) But that has to be expected. <br /> <br />I don't nave-any question <br />Larry~s initial draft. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />MR. JACKSON: I wouil.d defer to any draft he comes up with. <br /> <br />. - <br />MR. STAPLETON: 'Any further discussion? <br />MR. SPARKS: Mr. Chairman, I'might:add that:these hearings are just <br /> <br />-10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.