My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01023
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/8/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1524 <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. 'PETERSON: <br />MR. NELSON: <br />MR. STAPLE'IDN: <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />MR-:' SPARKS: <br /> <br />) <br />As I pointed out in the memo of June - <br />23rd, we were given an appropriation of <br />$100,000 by the last Legislature for coopera- <br />tive studies, and that, with a carryover <br />balance of $22,397.71, gives us a total of <br />$122,397.71. That money must be allocated <br />throughout the State. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The recommendations I made in the memo- <br />randum were $30,000 for the Fruitland Mesa <br />and Bostwick Park'projects, $lOhOOO for the <br />Rio Grande Salvage project and ~22,OOO for <br />the San Miguel project, making a total of <br />$62,000, which would leave us a balance in <br />that fund of $60;397.71. Those projects are <br />in the final completion stages and could be <br />completed in F. Y. 1960. That is the reason <br />for recommending these appropriations." <br /> <br />"Is there any discussion on entering <br />into a cooperative agreement with the Bureau <br />of Reclamation for further investigation and <br />studies on the Fruitland Mesa and Bostwick <br />Park projects in the amount of $30,OOO? If <br />not, I will entertain a motion that the <br />Director be given authority to enter into a <br />cooperative agreement between the State of <br />Colorado and the Bureau of Reclamation in the <br />amount of $30,000 for further studies on the <br />Bostwick.Park and Fruitland Mesa projects." <br /> <br />"I so move." <br /> <br />"Second the'motion." <br /> <br />"Is there any discussion? All those in <br />favor will signify by saying 'aye'; opposed - <br />the motion is declared passed. <br /> <br />The next one is the San Miguel in which <br />it is recommended that the State make avail- <br />able $22,000 to the Bureau to further studies <br />on the San Miguel project. Are there any <br />questions or discussion on that?" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"San Miguel took probably the biggest cut <br />out of the Durango office. This amount is <br />not enough to bring the appropriation for <br />that office to where they can maintain some <br />of the key personnel in the Durango office. <br />Bill Eakes said that approximately 30 in the <br />Durango office'will be transferred or dis- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.