Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />l-lR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SMITH: <br /> <br />l-lR. CRANDALL: <br /> <br />I>lR. SMITH : <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: <br /> <br />cne shall be. We, cf course, want to do the <br />best job we can cf wcrJdng for the full and <br />proper use cf water rescurces and nothing <br />else. Sc I am scrry and apclcgize if I ex- <br />pressed myself in a way that was misunderstccd <br />ctherwise, because it certainly is net the <br />case. <br /> <br />We have an array of prcjects that, in <br />total, can utilize mere water than we have. <br />Hew they are put tcgether is kind cf a puzzling <br />questicn fer us all. But I appreciate ycur <br />. ccmments. They are made from a platfcrm of <br />great experience, and we need and welccme ycur <br />ccunsel. " <br /> <br />"Are there any ether questions from members <br />cf the Board en the repcrt cf Regicn 4? <br /> <br />New fer our guests in the audience, this <br />gives ycu a real cppcrtunity tc chat with l1r. <br />Crandall abcut Regicn 4 and the prcjects that <br />ycu may be interested in. Dc we have any <br />questions from any member of our audience? <br />Hr. Smith." <br /> <br />"I>1r. crandall, I believe that this is con- <br />tained on page five of the repcrt. Ycu menticn <br />a $10,000 fund that was available tc de land <br />classification on the feasibility repcrt fer <br />Basalt. Wasn't that money advanced to the <br />Bureau by the Basalt Water Ccnservancy Dis- <br />trict?" <br /> <br />"Yes. That's a mistake. I had marked that <br />cut and I had hoped that that had been cor- <br />rected. " <br /> <br />"That's my only guesticn. I hear that Beard <br />\-,ould like to have that kncwn; that they have <br />had lccal inquiries regarding it." <br /> <br />"I should have been more specific. Thank <br />ycu, Phil, very much." <br />