Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />pipeline, oonduit, or other facility." <br /> <br />6. It ill\ based upon the prinoiple thati;he Authorii;y. shall operate primarily <br />in the interests of interstate commerce for'theomtrol of navigation, development <br />of power, and oontrol of floods. This subordinates irrigation development to the" <br />above purposes thereby ilnpairing the rights' of the states to the oontrol, <br />appropriation, use and distribution of water for irrigation and other benefioial <br />purposes. Vested rights in water under the 001, stitution and laws of the several <br />states, recognized by the Congress of the United States, would thus be plaoed in <br />jeopardy and oontinued agricultural development where irrigation is praatised would <br />be greatly impaired. Agrioultural development and incidental industrial develop_ <br />ment have been built up under a system of water rights established and now <br />reoognized in the various state constitutions and by the Congress of the United <br />States. <br /> <br />NiM THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by- the ColoradO Water Conservation Board, <br /> <br />Firstl That the Board is opposed to the propo80dArkansas Valley <br />Authority Act of' 1941 and recommend to the members of' the Congressionllll <br />delegation from Colorado that they oppose this measure and all similar measures <br />by all appropriate means. <br /> <br />Seoond: That all federal legislation relating to the control, <br />regula tion and utilization cf water and other natural resources; in interstaf;e <br />river basins should reoognize fully the principle of equitable oooperation between <br />','federal and staJl;e governments, eaoh oIllrating within its oonstU:utionaJllimita_ <br />.~. -1 tiona. <br />,""'~. <br /> <br />.,.!!f:.~ After discussing the foregoing resolution, it 1'/8.8 W1an1lllously adopted. <br /> <br />Direotor Stone oalled the attention of' the Board to the Proposa1 for a <br />special appropriation for the purpose of initiating in oooperation with the <br />United States Geological Survey, of the underground water resources of the stte. <br />There then follcwed a discussion of the proposed legisla tian by Mr. COde of the <br />Colorli\.do Agrioultural College. The discussion involved the question of provisions <br />of the proposed legislation for' underground water studies and investigation with <br />respect to the manner in which any filnds appropriated by the state should be <br />expended. <br /> <br />After discussion it was moved by Miss P~1ntel!' e.nd seconded by Mr. Bailey <br />that any appropriation bill making aVli\.ilablemoney for e.ninvestigation and ttudy <br />Q!' underground water of' the state be made available to the Colorli\.do Water. Conservation <br />Board! and that such funds be utilized! under an agreement with the United S>tates; <br />Geologioal Survey. or other agenoies, as, in the best judgment of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation BOli\.rd, and the Governor of the State, may be for the best interests; of <br />the state. <br /> <br />After further disoussion the motion wall una:n;11nously oarried. <br /> <br />Thereupon Mr. Carpenter submitted to the memb~rs,of' the Board a redraft of <br />the proposed stock water tank law which was discussed. <br /> <br />The disoussion was followed by a motion of Mr. Carpenter, seconded by <br />Mr. Foster that the Director be authOrized to subnit to all members of' the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, and others interested in the stook water tank <br />legislation, draftlJ of such legislation which have already been prepared for <br />criticism and that in the light of suoh critioism and further suggestions, <br /> <br /> <br />