My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00854
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00854
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:45:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1941
Description
Table of Contents and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />s:tatutory provision, by appropriate aotion of the Congress, that any <br />investigation of a projeot proposing the exportation of water from the Colorado <br />River Basin inolude the investigation 'of the neoessary t'acili-ties and t'ea-tures <br />to proteot the present and prospective uses of water within the basin from which <br />the water is; exported and that this policy be submitted to the Colorado River <br />Basin Committee of Fourteen, and an effort made to obta:ln the approval of suoh <br />policy by the representa-tive$ ot' the other six statelli ot' the ColoradO River Basin. <br /> <br />After discussion the motion was unanimously earried. <br /> <br />Thereupon the following resolution was proposed by Mr. Foster, who, <br />with second of Miss Pointer, Mr. Dille and Mr. Hinderlider moved its adoption, <br />to-wit: <br /> <br /> <br />," <br />. , <br />ld <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />ig <br />r <br />~he <br /> <br />.e <br /> <br />laS <br />Jer- <br />lr <br /> <br />h.e <br />the <br />t <br />to <br /> <br />WHEREA$, Senate Bill No. 280 and House Bill No. 1823, known and cited <br />as; the "Arkansas Valley Authority Act of 1941", haTe been inbroduoed recently <br />in the Congresffi of the United Statell, and -the introduotion of similar- billa <br />relating to other,.i ver basins of the United Statelli is c'ontemplated, <br /> <br />AND WHEREAS', the Bill to oreate the proposed Arkansas Valley Authority <br />is objectionable for the following MAJOR reasonlt.: <br /> <br />1. It provides for exolusive federal oontrol, within the disoretionof <br />the Authority of the plann:lng, oonstruoting and operation of projeots <br />designed to provide for navigation, flood oontrol, power development, <br />reolamation of publio lands, and other purposes. <br /> <br />2. . It prevents the states; whose interests are involved from entering <br />into compaotllJ without the consent of the Authority, :In oontravention of the <br />oonstitutional right of sovereign states to make treaties, or CQ\Ilpacts, among <br />themselves, subject only to the consent of the Congress. <br /> <br />3. It appears to subjeot judicial oontroversies involving the right to <br />appropriate and use water for irrigation or other benefioial purposes to the <br />jurisdiction of the Federal Court in the district where the principal offioe <br />of the proposed Authority may be located. <br /> <br />4. It empowers the proposed Authority to investigate, oonstruct and <br />ope rate projects without regard to other agencies of the federal government. <br />These agenoies could participate in suoh aotivities only if requested so to <br />do by the Authority. For nearly forty years the Bureau of Reolamation acting <br />direotly under Congressional authorization has carried on' a progrlUll in full <br />reoognition of state rights. <br /> <br />5. It authorizeII' and empowers the Authority to issue bonds fully and <br />unconditionally guaranteed by the United Sta.teS! for the following and other <br />purposes: "aoquiring, improving Ilnd operating existing oanals, conduits, <br />laterals, pipelines, ditohes and incidental works and facilities, or in <br />aoquiring any int-erests therein", aoql1iring "privately OftlleO. * * * * * * <br />irrigationpr6perties'within the a.rea of its operations", extending oredit <br />to stm.s, counties, an~ munioipalitieS! and generally doing anything which is <br />deamed neoessary or appropriate to the purposes of the Act. In the case of <br />oonstruction projeots, Section 15 (a), the aggregate limitation for bond <br />issues; apparently is not olear and definite, and bonds in any amount tiot <br />exceeding $50,000,000 may be issued for any single, "dam, steam plant, oanal, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.