My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00822
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/27/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />IhO <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey informed the Board that we cannot do that <br />without authority to spend the money. <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher said, "If we follow Mr. Breitenstein's suggestion <br />on the suggestion of alternates we are in position to make <br />recommendations today." <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey advised that that would be putting the cart <br />before the horse, that committee appointed to draw resolution <br />providing for the committees should act first; that we <br />should wait until Mr. Breitenstein's committee reports to <br />us, setting up the Conference Committee, he said. <br /> <br />Mr. Saunders explained that he thought the Committee just <br />going to operate on the expenditure of the $100,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher asked how far can the Committee go. He said, <br />seems like the enlargement of this Committee is an invitation <br />to meet together with all the other sections of the State. It <br />will be cumbersome to work out in the smaller areas; more <br />work for the committee than if you select alternates. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford said, "Mr. "Chairman, there might be only a <br />few occasions when it would be necessary to have a substitute <br />or an alternate. A great deal is lost when the Committee gets <br />too large, that is, if the Committee is an action committee <br />if decisions must be made quickly. Regarding spreading this <br />work over the entire Western Slope, it is not possible to make <br />a study of the Blue River and tributaries and secure the total <br />effect at Grand Junction without taking into consideration <br />all other streams contributing to the flow of the Colorado at <br />Grand Junction. Fundamental data should be collected for every <br />basin on the Slope. After we secure this we will be able to <br />concentrate on pressure points. Take the Blue River-Denver <br />at that particular time. There is no conflict. We had, you <br />will remember for the last Committee meeting, a time allotment <br />of six months. The report can be rendered 6 months if we <br />proceed i~~ediately. Conference Committee has taken for <br />granted that resolution of February 17, gave it some authority, <br />and has started already on the economic and business survey. <br />Committee of four or five is a good size. <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher: "If Committee is enlarged, have to start <br />from beginning." <br /> <br />Mr. Hunter expressed the op1n1on that "We don't have any <br />Committee: Mr. Dutcher has withdrawn his motion." <br /> <br />Mr. Saunders then asked, "I wonder if Mr. Bailey's <br />objection would be met after we ratify the amendment of five <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.