My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00812
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1998
Description
Flood Section - Colorado River Issues - Multi-Objective Floodplain Management Study for Roaring Fork
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,-<~'" ,',,~ <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />3) Existing infrastructure at risk <br />Identify all existing infrastructure (roads and bridges, sewer facilities, water <br />supply and delivery facilities, and other utilities, governmental facilities, schools <br />and medical facilities) facing potential risk from flooding and/or stream <br />instability. Prepare criteria for distinguishing between "HIGH", "MEDIUM" <br />and "LOW" risk and develop a tabulation of all facilities in each category, <br /> <br />4) Clarification of existing regulatory requirements <br />Develop a "regulatory cookbook" for property owners and local officials. The <br />"cookbook" will describefederal, state and local regulatory requirements <br />regarding human activity in the rivers and in the adjacent floodplains. Describe <br />the procedures related to these regulatory requirements. <br /> <br />5) Description of transbasin diversions (ADD-ON OR DROP-OFF) <br />Provide a tabulation and a brief description of each transbasin diversion from the <br />Roaring Fork River watershed. Identify other factors, such as reservoir <br />operations and agricultural and municipal wastewater return flows, which may <br />affect flows in the river. <br /> <br />6) Identification of water quality issues for specific locations <br />Identify the water quality issues at two (2) specific locations: Brush Creek in and <br />around the Town of Snow mass Village, and Seven Castles on the Frying Pan <br />River. <br /> <br />Conclusions & Recommendations <br /> <br />1) Alternative stream stabilization measures <br />Generate a list of alternative stream stabilization measures. Estimate costs, <br />habitat and recreation considerations, and the likelihood of success of these <br />measures for each of the identified areas of stream instability. Provide a range of <br />options from more simple to more complex to suit varying capabilities and <br />resources available to local entities (some entities can implement less complex <br />options and some can implement more complex options). <br /> <br />2) Define stream stability monitoring program <br />Develop a list of scientific parameters to be studied on an ongoing basis to define <br />a stream stability monitoring program. Provide threshold standards for each of <br />these parameters to determine when a stream reach is: stable, prone to instability, <br />unstable, or highly unstable. Describe the technical apparatus and the <br />methodologies to be used in a long-term monitoring program. Provide cost <br />estimates for equipment purchase, staff time and maintenance needs. <br /> <br />--; -lllf~':~'~ <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.