Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />3) Priority locations for monitoring and for mitigation <br />Determine stream locations best suited for ongoing stream stability monitoring <br />activities. Determine whether these locations are the best locations for mitigation <br />projects. Develop a map and accompanying text descriptions of the locations for <br />monitoring and the locations for mitigation. <br /> <br />Development of DisplaylEducational Materials <br /> <br />1) Review of historic aerial photographs (ADD-ON OR DROP-OFF) <br />Review historic aerial photographs of the Roaring Fork River from various <br />sources, Determine what changes are clemonstrated by those photographs. <br />Develop displays using the photographs to illustrate trends and relationships on <br />the river. <br /> <br />2) Computer modeling of effects of stream stability mitigation measures <br />(ADD-ON OR DROP-OFF) <br />Represent on a computer model the predicted effects of various stream stability <br />mitigation measures. Include modeling of the "after-flood" floodplain to <br />demonstrate how the mitigation measures and the stream channel they are <br />designed to protect fare in a 1 DO-year Or 500-year flood. <br /> <br />3) Graphic demonstration of flow in river (ADD-ON OR DROP-OFF) <br />Develop a display of the amount of water in the Roaring Fork River under low <br />flow conditions. The display would show the effects of various diversions and <br />returnjlows on the river, from Independence Pass to Glenwood Springs. <br /> <br />~ <br />