Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the best we have been able to come up with at this time. and they are in <br />conformity with the operating principles. Based upon the recommendations <br />of the Division of Wildlife and the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wild- <br />life. particular points have been designated to effect these releases. <br />The operating principles merely state that 30 cubic feet.per second shall <br />be released as a minimum release from the collection poiht. The critical I <br />point is below the junction of the North Fork of the Fryingpan and the <br />Fryingpan. That is the real control point for the whole system. This <br />is equated into monthly flows. 200 cfs for instance. during the month <br />of June. 100 cfs during the month of July. 75 cfs during the month of <br />August, and so on. That amount of water has to reach that point. 'The <br />operating principles provide for a minimum release of 30 cfs at the <br />project diversion points. However. the minimum flows at the diversion <br />points will have to be increased at any time that the m1n1mum flow is <br />not met at the junction of the Fryingpan and the North Fork. <br /> <br />There are nine tributaries involved in the distribution of this 30 second <br />feet. The flows have been apportioned based to a large extent upon the <br />historic contribution of those streams to the main stream. Last Chance <br />Creek, a tributary of the North Fork is not included in the 30 second <br />feet. although it was originally intended to be. We have taken it out. <br />Actually. the minimum flow now is 33 second feet. rather than 30. Lime <br />Creek was never included in the original operating principles. A sepa- <br />rate appropriation has been made for it and that was not specified in <br />the operating principles. The appropriation was based upon the recom- <br />mendation of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and the Division <br />of Wildlife. <br /> <br />We have specified continuous flows on down to the entry into Ruedi Res- <br />ervoir and then pick up a further flow below Ruedi Reservoir to carry <br />it on to the Roaring Fork. The operating principles do not carry the <br />flows beyond the point of release. <br /> <br />As I understand now. the Division of Wildlife would like to take another <br />look at the flows below Ruedi. These tributaries are rather minor. but <br />at times a considerable amount of water in the early part of the season <br />comes into the Fryingpan below the release point on Ruedi Reservoir. <br /> <br />There has been a suggestion made by the local people that those minimum I <br />flows at the collection point are insufficient and should be increased. <br />That is impossible at this point in history. After the long bitter <br />years of negotiating the operating principles for the project and the <br />long fight in Congress. I don't think this board wants to reopen the <br />matter again and try to negotiate some new minimum flows. To do so <br /> <br />-48- <br />