My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00736
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00736
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/18/1958
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1026 <br /> <br />is prepared by or under the superV1s~on of West~ <br />ern Colorado or Eastern Colorado, you cannot come <br />up with an unprejudiced report. It's impossible. <br />That is why the thing was worked out the way it <br />is. I will say, for the benefit of Mr. Peterson, <br />that I am the bird that suggested this particular <br />line of action and I say that after having said <br />,to you that I think I am as jealous of Western <br />Colorado as anybody here. <br /> <br />Let me, since I am on my feet and if you <br />will excuse me gene lemen, say that I have spent <br />quite a bit of time studying our position on the <br />Colorado River. It isn't dangerous, it's critical. <br />While we are sitting here discussing this thing <br />this afternoon, while we have been working on it <br />since last November, the States of California and <br />Arizona and Nevada have been busy formulating ways <br />and means of getting Colorado's water. You doubt <br />me? The State of California was apportioned <br />4;400,000 acre feet of water out of the Colorado <br />River. By its Self Limitation Act, the Legisla- <br />ture of California adopted that figure. Califor- <br />nia now says, in it's official publication, that <br />by virtue of it's compacts and by appropriation <br />and use, which they are doing now', they are going <br />to increase that to 5,400,000 acre feet, one mill- <br />ion acre feet more than they themselves said they <br />wanted. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />At this moment, while we are talking about <br />this thing, the Republic of Mexico is depleting <br />the flow of the Colorado River at the International <br />Boundary by a pumping operation. That was consid- <br />ered in the case of Arizona vs. California. There <br />is an estimate of 800,000 acre feet a year. In <br />addition, 'they are planning an expansion of their <br />pumping program. While we are talking about it <br />here, .while we have been talking about it since <br />last November, the California and Arizona boys <br />are figuring out ways and means to keep Glen Canyon <br />from performing the function it must perform if we <br />are to get our share of this water. I think it is <br />pretty high time that the State of Colorado <br />started to get the liriformation it has to have; and <br />it has got to have it day before yesterday, not <br />today. And if you delay this again in getting it <br />underway, (I do not object to any delay in details <br />as it is going to take a long time getting details <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.