Laserfiche WebLink
<br />603 <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />"I have a letter from Mr. E. O. <br />Larson as follows: <br /> <br />United States <br />Department of the Interior <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Region 4 <br />Post Office Box 360 <br />Salt Lake City 10, Utah <br /> <br />Dec. 19, 1956 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Ivan C. Crawford, Director," <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, <br />212 State Office Building, <br />Denver 2, Colorado. <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Crawford: <br /> <br />We are in receipt of a letter from State Engineer <br />L. C. Bishop of Wyoming, stating that it is the desire of <br />the water users in the Little Snake River Valley, in which <br />his office concurs, to have further investigations on the <br />Savery Reservoir unit of the Savery-Pot Hook project sepa- <br />rated from the Pot Hook unit of that project. <br /> <br />Would you kindly advise if your State concurs in <br />this suggestion, and if so recommend what if anything <br />should be done at the present time in further investigation <br />of the Pot Hook unit of the project for use of water in <br />Colorado. As I remember in discussing this matter with you <br />verbally at one time, you indicated that the people in Colo- <br />rado were not too interested in this development at this' <br />time. If this is still your conclusion, we would appreciate <br />being so advised. : <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />E. O. Larson/s <br />Regional Director <br /> <br />The question now arises is th~re <br />any objection in this State to the <br />State of Wyoming proceeding on that <br />part of the project located in Wyom- <br />ing? I personally can see no objec- <br />tion to this but I purposely held up <br />this letter, as you can tell by the <br />date, until such time as I could talk <br />the matter over with Mr. McCandless." <br /> <br />I <br />