My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00639
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:42:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/11/1964
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />however, they are preparin9 tobutt9n that <br />report up and get it on its way without those <br />comments. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />On the Dolores Project, the feasibility <br />report was submitted to the Commissioner on <br />May 31, 1963. The report is being drafted with <br />a few comments that had been received from a <br />field level review and is to be sent out for <br />distribution as required under the Flood Con- <br />trol Act of 1944. <br /> <br />The most recent activity on our Bostwick <br />Park, Fruitland Mesa and Savery-pot Hook Proj- <br />ects occurred this week in Washington. You <br />will recall we held field hearings on these <br />projects about a year ago. They had what we <br />hope are the final hearings, as far as the <br />House is concerned, yesterday and the day <br />before in Washington. On those hearings, <br />probably they didn't go along as well as we <br />anticipated but I expect as well as we could <br />reasonably expect. By the way, I was glad to <br />see that your Director here was such an able <br />rancher. He answered many rather technical <br />questions on farm size and ranching operations. <br /> <br />On the San Miguel Project, it is moving <br />along about on schedule. The final designs <br />have been completed and are under review on <br />many of the features. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Moving on to the West Divide Project, I <br />notice in the report they say it is slightly <br />behind schedule. 1 think we are essentially <br />on schedule. We are holding our final coordi- <br />nation meetings nOW with other cooperating <br />agencies. We have started a draft of our <br />report. If those things move along I think we <br />will be able to maintain our schedule on that <br />project. <br /> <br />On Dallas Creek I think we have picked up <br />a little bit on that report. It is under final <br />stage of drafting now. Essentially the majority <br />of the work has been completed in our office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.