My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/17/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT MINUTES <br /> <br />FOR WATER CONSERVATION BOARD MEETING <br /> <br />OF MARCH 17, 1980 <br /> <br />Vice-Chairman, Kroeger, called the meeting to order and asked <br /> <br />for additions or corrections to minutes of the May meeting forward- <br /> <br />ed to members in the mail. <br />'7 C)tf" ') i <br />A motion to approve was made by t1 I) .' :><t' fyJ /l'Y\x.V<-t <br /> <br />seconded by Mr. Fetcher. Vice-Chairman, Kroeger declared them <br /> <br />approved. <br /> <br />He then called for a report on status of legislation by Mr. <br /> <br />McDonald. Mr. McDonald commented on House bills 1039 and 1040 <br /> <br />previously sent to board members and briefly reviewed in January. <br /> <br />Both are potential funding sourceS for the Water Conservation <br /> <br />Board construction fund. House bill 1039 does so by diverting <br /> <br />a percentage of the sales and use tax into the construction fund <br /> <br />in the amount of 5% per year for the next 10 fiscal years, House <br /> <br />bill 1040 has a different source in that it takes a percentage of <br /> <br />the tax surp&us that exists after general fund spending, now 1imitedd <br /> <br />to a 7% increase per year, and places that percentage in the <br /> <br />construction fund. Both bills have passed out of the House Agri- <br /> <br />cultural Livestock and Water Committee and have been referred to <br /> <br />the Committee as a whole. Neither has received floor action. Mr. <br /> <br />McDonald pointed out that a number of considerations are going on <br /> <br />in the legislature about significant increases in funding for <br /> <br />Water Development projects. He has been aslkd to provide infor- <br /> <br />mation on the ability of the Board to initiate construction on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.