Board Meeting 03/17/1980

• Board Meeting Date: 3/17/1980
• Description: Agenda and Minutes
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

". .

~. I'

'. ...-

e

Automation control
system [or 1",,11 pUJOlp
motors

Not includEd

Included

Conveyanc.e channel
fishery

Potential

No justification for
one plan; no Public
Law 89-72 partici-
pant; not costed

Pumping plants

. Not ilicluded

TvlO plants included,
one at San Luis Lake
and cne at the
channel outfall

- - - - - - - GeRst;F-u-c-t~i-on~ per-ig,d - - - -- - - - - - - - _8 -J-e.8.T.S- - --

.10 _)"cars _ _ _ _ ,

Notes:

1/

Does not include 8,500 acres outside Stage 5, for the 1;......estern segment of
the proposed Mishak NWR.

?)

Subsequent to j-Mp Nov. ]979 DPR: aquifer modeling indicates that 23 wells
should be .added to Stage 1-2 to optimize objectives (more wells with smaller
capacities to achieve water table dra\vdovlllS in an area of 10\" aquifer
transmissivity).

3/

Data are insufficient to determine: (a) if channel lining is required, i.e.,
leakage questions; and, (b) if lined, the extent and type of channel lining.
For costing purposes in the DPR, an additional 20% of well pumping
energy costs ~vere assumed for recirculating channel leakage. Economic
trade-offs for channel lining vs. recirculation have not been analyzed,
but construction cost estimates would increase if lining Is used.

4/

Mishak development costs, but without ground water supply, were included.

.'

7